OECD Economic Studies No. 20, Spring 1993
GLOBALISATION AND INTRA-FIRM TRADE: AN EMPIRICAL NOTE
Marcos Bonturi and Kiichiro Fukasaku
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
1. Intra-firm trade and intra-industry trade. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
II. Data sources on intra-firm trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
1 1 1 . Evidence from the United States and Japan.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
IV. Concluding remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
The authors are grateful to William Zeile of the United States Department of Commerce, Takashi Nakano of the Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry, and to Nick Vanston, Henry Ergas and John P. Martin of the OECD Economics Department for helpful comments and suggestions. Thanks are also extended to Maria-Beatrice Vinci for statistical assistance.
Products which are traded internationally, but which stay within the ambit of a multinational enterprise (MNE), represent a significant portion of foreign trade for sev- eral OECD countries. This type of trade is called intra-firm trade as opposed to interna- tional trade among unrelated parties, also called arms length trade. Intra-firm trade is an important part of the process of globalisation, by which is meant the increasing inter- dependence of markets and production in different countries through trade in goods and services, cross-border flows of capital, and exchanges of technology.
The phenomenon of intra-firm trade is of interest to trade policy makers, as well as to competition and tax authorities. The use of transfer pricing in intra-firm trade may introduce an element of uncertainty into the value of a fairly large part of international trade and into customs valuation needed for the application of tariffs or similar mea- sures. Competition and tax issues may also arise from intra-firm trade to the extent that the latter may facilitate the dissimulation of real transaction prices between the parent company and its affiliates.
A surge in foreign direct investment (FDI) during the 1980s has been cited as evidence in favour of globalisation; it is argued that MNEs have played a central role in globalisation by extending their corporate networks beyond national boundaries through the establishment of foreign branches and subsidiaries. It is often assumed that intra-firm trade reflects these foreign production activities by MNEs, as they trans- fer their factors of production from one country to another.
Little attention has been paid so far to the phenomenon of intra-firm trade. The literature on the subject is still relatively limited and recent.* This is partly because most international trade statistics do not distinguish between intra-firm trade and arms length trade. This paper aims to throw some empirical light on the phenomenon by analysing the available data on intra-firm trade for two major OECD countries, the United States and Japan.3
The paper begins by examining some conceptual issues relating to intra-firm trade and intra-industry trade (Section I). Section II briefly explains the nature and limitation of the data used, while Section 111 contains an empirical analysis of recent develop- ments in intra-firm trade in the United States and Japan. The final section presents some concluding remarks.
I. INTRA-FIRM TRADE AND INTRA-INDUSTRY TRADE
In considering the interrelationship between globalisation and international trade, it is conceptually useful to distinguish between four types of international trade: (A) intra- industry, intra-firm trade; (B) intra-industry, arms-length trade; (C) inter-industry, intra- firm trade; and (D) inter-industry, arms-length trade.
Intra-industry trade is defined as the mutual exchange of similar goods within the same product category (Grubel and Lloyd, 1975, and Greenaway and Milner, 1986). Intra-industry trade is generally a function of product differentiation and may or may not involve intra-firm trade. If motor vehicles produced in France are exported to the United States and U.S.-built motor vehicles are exported to France, the two countries are said to be involved in intra-industry trade even though such trade is not necessarily intra-firm trade.
Intra-industry trade can be readily calculated for any given product category, as only the traditional bilateral trade statistics for that product category are needed4 Intra- firm trade is harder to quantify, since knowledge of the relationship between the firms involved in the transactions is necessary. Data on intra-firm trade are available only
. through firm surveys, involving the preparation of questionnaires by national authori- ties. (The data sources on intra-firm trade are discussed in the next section.)
Most trade in manufactured goods among OECD countries is of the intra-industry type. Intra-industry trade is particularly important within Europe, and to a lesser extent, in North America, accounting for roughly 60 to 70 per cent of total trade in manufacture^.^ This trade generally concerns differentiated products exchanged between countries that are similar in terms of per capita income and relative factor endowments. It has also been argued that economies of scale play an important role in explaining the industry pattern of intra-industry trade. On the other hand, trade between developed and developing countries (North-South) is mostly of the inter-industry type, reflecting large differences in relative factor endowments between the two groups of countries. Inter-industry trade among unrelated parties (type D) – e.g. international exchange of cotton cloth produced by northern manufacturers for wine produced by southern farmers .- is the type of trade which international trade textbooks traditionally deal with.
Trade in manufactured goods between developed countries is predominantly of the intra-industry type and often takes the form of intra-firm trade. An important exam- ple of intra-industry, intra-firm trade (Type A) is United States-Canada-Mexico automo- bile trade. Intra-firm trade is also the dominant pattern of U.S. exports to Canada and Europe in the case of non-electrical machinery and chemicals.
Another example is trade in manufactured goods between Pacific Asian econo- mies. These economies have seen a rapid increase in intra-industry trade as a propor- tion of their total trade over the last decade. Such increase in intra-industry trade in Pacific Asian economies can be primarily attributed to the globalisation of corporate activities by U.S. and Japanese firms and, more recently, by other Asian firms. This involves assembly-line production based on imported parts and components in differ- ent countries in East and South East Asia (Fukasaku, 1992; Gross, 1986).
To the extent that international sourcing of parts and components by Northern firms takes the form of non-equity, subcontracting arrangements with Southern coun- terparts, this trade is classified as intra-industry and arms-length trade (Type B). Some argue that non-equity forms of corporate networking are of importance for the recent development of Pacific Asian economies based on outward-oriented industrialisa- tion (Oman, 1989).
Japanese and other countries trading firms in East Asia are believed to be heavily involved in intra-firm trade of an inter-industry character (Type C). Japanese trading firms are both intermediary and organiser of global chains of production and marketing operations handling various primary commodities and manufactured goods. In the latter case, they usually involve small- and medium-scale manufacturers in various industries at home and abroad.
II. DATA SOURCES ON INTRA-FIRM TRADE
Data sources on intra-firm trade are available only through firm surveys, involving the preparation of questionnaires by national authorities. The US. Department of Commerce publishes data concerning related-party, trade between US. affiliates and their foreign parents, and between foreign affiliates and their U S . parents. Data on trade of foreign affiliates with Japanese parents are also available from Japans Minis- try of International Trade and Industry (MIT1).6 A few other OECD countries have also reported collecting data on intra-firm trade, but these data appear to be either partial (Canada, Sweden) or limited to service transactions such as royalties and similar payments (United Kingdom). Some limited information is also available from private sou~ces.~ Given the limitations of other sources, the present study is based only on data from the U.S. Department of Commerce and MITI.
The Department of Commerce has published three recent benchmark surveys (1977, 1982 and 1989) with data for foreign affiliates of US. companies, and two recent benchmark surveys (1980, 1987) with data for U S . affiliates of foreign companies. These data can be disaggregated into approximately 30 manufacturing categories. The nationality of parent and affiliate companies is also available. Besides the benchmark surveys, annual surveys are also available, although they are more limited in coverage – for instance, only majority-owned foreign affiliates are covered. In those studies, the Department of Commerce provides the universe estimates on an annual basis.
MlTl has published data from four benchmark surveys (for fiscal years 1980, 1983, 1986 and 1989) of foreign affiliates of Japanese companies. The survey data published by MlTl are less detailed than those published by the Department of Commerce, but useful comparisons can be made between the two sources. Data are available for affiliates, without distinction between majority and non-majority owned. However, MlTl does not provide the universe figures estimated on the basis of its survey data, which makes it difficult to compare data on intra-firm trade in different years.8 In the following section, data from the latest benchmark survey – fiscal year 1989 – are used.
Most studies of intra-firm trade use the data from the sources described above. A few attempts have been made at improving the quality of the data provided by the Department of Commerce, but the results are not considerably different and do not show a significant change in the magnitude of intra-firm trade flows.9
Given all the complex arrangements through which firms co-operate, any empirical analysis needs to define what constitutes a firm. An ideal definition would involve an estimate of the level of control and ownership, but this would be practical only on a case-by-case basis. The 10 per cent ownership cut-off point used in both the Japanese and the U S . sources defining an affiliate – and thus a firm – presents no significant problems.O The OECD benchmark definition of foreign direct investment recommends the same hurdle in determining whether a direct investment relationship exists. Most double-taxation agreements also use this cut-off point to determine differential with- holding tax rates.
The interpretation of the data collected poses more serious problems. To the extent that transfer pricing occurs, the data on trade flows may reflect the under- invoicing or over-invoicing of intra-firm transactions. Also, the problem of classification of data between sectors can considerably change the results. For instance, in the data published by the U S . Department of Commerce, all investment by an enterprise is classified by the principal activity of that enterprise even if it operates in different sectors. This presents obvious problems with highly-diversified conglomerates, but it is also significant in more numerous cases where a manufacturing firm invests in distribu- tion activities. Lastly, there are serious limitations in the data due to confidentiality problems, as firm-specific data are not disclosed.I1
111. EVIDENCE FROM THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN
The tables below give an overview of the relative importance of intra-firm trade for the United States and Japan. Several points are worth highlighting. First, a high propor- tion – more than one third – of U S . merchandise trade is intra-firm (Table 1).
Second, the overall share of intra-firm trade in total US. trade has not significantly increased between 1977 and 1989.l* An exception is U.S. affiliates imports from their foreign parents, which rose steadily from 19 per cent of total US. merchandise imports in 1977 to 26 per cent in 1989. Most of this increase was accounted for by firms from Japan and others – mostly South Korea. The share of Canadian and European firms both decreased between 1977 and 1989 (Table 2).
Third, U S . intra-firm trade, both exports and imports, is mostly concentrated in industries which are intensive in technology and human capital such as machinery, electriclelectronic equipment and transportation equipment industries (Table 3). On the other hand, fuels and minerals represent a large but decreasing share of US. imports shipped by foreign affiliates to their US. parents.13
It is worth stressing that, in contrast to the rest of U S . intra-firm trade, most imports by US. affiliates from their foreign parents are related to distribution, especially in the motor vehicle and equipment industries. Distribution accounted for nearly 80 per cent of
Table 1. US. intra-firm trade’ 1977-89
Intra-firm exDorts Intra-firm imports
1977 1978 1979
d 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989
Exports shipped to US. parents
by foreign affiliates
MOFAs2 Total only
. . . .
32.4 29.3 – –
– – 46.6 44.3 – 45.1 – 52.7 – 57.6 – 58.9 – 65.2 – 78.2
Exports ,hipped by
U.S. iffiliates to foreign parent (billion dollars)
11.7 16.6 22.1 21 .o 26.9 25.0 22.6 27.1 25.9 21.9 19.1 26.4 32.8
As a percentage of total US. merchandise exports
26.3 23.8 9.5 – – 11.4 – – 11.8 – – 9.3 – – 11.3
21.5 20.5 11.6 – 21.9 11.0 – 23.5 12.1 – 26.3 11.8 – 25.9 9.6 – 25.7 7.5 – 24.3 8.2
24.5 23.5 9′.0
Imports shipped to U.S. parents
by foreign affiliates
MOFAs2 Total only (E) (F)
32.6 30.9 – –
– – 41.6 38.5 – 41.6 – 49.3 – 51.8 – 50.0 – 55.9 – 62.5
Imports :hipped to
us. ffiliates by foreign parent (billion dollars)
30.9 39.5 45.3 47.0 52.2 51.9 54.8 70.5 81.7 93.4
108.2 118.4 128.0
Total As a percentage of total US. merchandise imports
20.3 19.3 19.2 39.6 – – 21.2 – – – 20.4 – – – 18.3 – – – 19.1 –
16.3 15.1 20.4 36.7 – 15.4 20.3 – – 14.2 20.3 – – 14.7 23.2 –
– 13.2 25.5 – – 14.2 25.8 –
– 13.1 24.4 –
15.4 14.7 26.0 41.4
1 . The above data refers to non-bank US. parents and affiliates. 2. MOFAs stand for majority-owned foreign affiliates. Sources: US. Department of Commerce, U.S. Direct lnvestrnent Abroad 1977; 1982 Benchmark Survey Data; Revised Esfimates, 1983-88; and 1989 Benchmark Survey,
Preliminary Results; Survey of Current Business, September 1986, June 1987, June 1988. June 1989, June 1990 and October 1991. IMF, lnternational Financial Statistics Yearbook 1991. U S . Department of Commerce, Foreign Direct lnvesfment in the United States, Operations of U S . Affiliates, 1977-80; Revised Esfimates, 1981-86 and 1988; 1987 Benchmark Survey, Final Results; Preliminary 1989 Estimates; and Survey of Current Business. November 1983, December 1984, November 1985. October 1986, May 1987, May 1988, July 1990 and July 1991.
Table 2. U S . affiliates imports from foreign parents by country of parent As a percentage of total intra-fin imports by US. affiliates
Canada Europe Japan All others Total
1977 10.7 41.6 44.6 3.1 100.0 1982 8.1 30.4 51.9 9.6 100.0 1989 5.7 30.9 53.5 10.0 100.0
Source: See Table 1
total U.S. affiliates purchases from their foreign parents, with wholesale trade in motor vehicles and equipment accounting for almost 40 per cent of total. By contrast, all manufacturing activities together were responsible for only 16 per cent of total intra-firm sales from foreign parents to U.S. affiliates. This clearly attests to the importance of direct investment in foreign distribution activities as a means of promoting exports. For example, Yamawaki (1 991) argues that the success of Japanese manufacturing firms in exporting to the U.S. is strongly associated with their commitments of resources to local distributional activities.
In fact, the data on all U.S. imports shipped to U.S. affiliates – not only by their foreign parents, but also by unaffiliated foreign companies – confirm the relative impor- tance of wholesale trade for Japanese companies. Almost 95 per cent of imports by U.S. affiliates of Japanese parents were classified as wholesale trade in 1989. This contrasts with 48 per cent for affiliates of European parents, 31 per cent for affiliates of Canadian parents and 17 per cent for affiliates of other countries parents.
As noted above, care needs to be exercised in interpreting these results. As each intra-firm transaction is classified under the principal sector of economic activity in which the firm is engaged, the activity of trading firms or of U.S. affiliates engaged mainly in distributional activities may have significantly influenced the aggregate figures.
Lastly, intra-firm trade between the United States and other OECD countries is mostly composed of parents sales to affiliates rather than the other way around (Table 4). On the other hand, US. firms established in non-OECD countries tend to buy more from their affiliates than the latter sell to them. Exceptions to this rule are U.S. firms established in Canada, which buy as much as they sell to their affiliates.
Turning to the Japanese case, it should be stressed that the data from the MlTl survey are more difficult to interpret, as its coverage is relatively limited. It is, for example, impossible to determine the share of intra-firm trade in total Japanese trade, given the official published data. What can be determined is the share of intra-firm trade in total foreign trade involving the companies covered by the survey.
Table 5 shows that wholesale trade represents a large percentage of Japanese firms intra-firm trade, especially on the import side. This reflects the significance of corporate networks established by Japanese trading firms in foreign trade activities. This predominance of wholesale activities could also be explained by the fact that Japanese foreign direct investment is relatively recent. It has been argued that a higher
Table 3. Trade between U.S. parents and their majority-owned foreign affiliates (MOFAs) in selected years
As a percentage of total US. merchandise trade
Food Machinery Road Metal Other Crude Fuels Chemicals (ex trans Manuf. Total equip . ) Beverages materials
Year Country of affiliate products Tobacco
A. Exports shipped by U.S. parents to MOFAs of which:
1977 100.0 1982 100.0 1989 100.0 1977 42.9 1982 34.9 1989 37.4 1977 2.5 1982 4.7 1989 7.0 1977 32.3 1982 34.2 1989 31.5 1977 2.4 1982 3.3 1989 7.1 1977 19.9 1982 22.8 1989 17.0
5.3 3.1 4.5 3.0 3.0 1 .I 1 .o 0.5 0.7 0.3 n.a. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 2.3 2.9 2.2 1.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 n.a. n.a. 0.7 0.3 0.8 0.4 n.a. n.a.
1.5 2.2 1.7 0.3 n.a. n.a. 0.0 n.a. n.a. 0.3 0.7 0.6 n.a. 0.0 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
11.6 31.1 11.7 41 .O 13.0 40.2 2.2 9.1 2.0 8.3 2.6 7.6 0.2 0.8 0.2 2.2 0.2 2.7 5.2 12.1 5.2 16.4 5.5 16.8 0.8 1 .o 0.9 1.9 1 .I 3.7 3.2 8.0 3.4 12.3 3.6 9.5
29.5 3.0 14.0 24.3 2.9 9.3 27.1 1.9 11.0 24.7 0.9 3.9 20.0 0.6 n.a. 22.4 0.6 3.0 1.1 0.1 0.3 1.7 n.a. 0.4 3.4 0.0 0.6 1.0 1.2 6.4 n.a. 1.3 4.5 0.9 0.9 4.4 n.a. 0.0 0.2 n.a. 0.1 n.a. 0.0 0.1 1.3 n.a. 0.8 3.3 n.a. n.a. n.a. 0.4 0.2 1.8
8. imports shipped to U.S. parents by MOFAs of which:
1977 1982 1989 1977 1982 1989 1977 1982 1989 1977 1982 1989 1977 1982 1989 1977 1982 1989
100.0 100.0 100.0 35.5 43.0 44.9 1.3 4.0 8.9 10.8 10.2 18.0 1 .I 2.0 2.7 51.2 40.8 25.6
2.3 3.8 3.1 3.8 2.1 1.6 0.6 2.1 0.2 1.6 0.3 0.6 n.a. 0.0 0.0 0.0 n.a. 0.0 0.5 n.a. n.a. 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.0 n.a. n.a. 0.0 0.0 0.0 n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.0 ma. 0.7
44.0 32.3 11.2 2.9 n.a. n.a. 0.0 n.a. 0.0 3.0 n.a. n.a. n.a. 0.0 0.0 ma. n.a. n.a.
2.2 15.1 3.5 22.1 4.6 32.3. 0.6 4.3 n.a. 4.3 1.5 3.8 n.a. 0.8 0.1 n.a. 0.1 3.6 0.8 3.0 1.6 3.3 2.0 8.5 0.0 n.a. 0.0 n.a. 0.1 2.3 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 0.9 14.1
24.2 2.3 n.a. 27.4 2.7 4.4 36.2 1.6 8.9 22.2 0.7 n.a. 25.6 0.6 1.8 29.8 0.9 2.4 n.a. 0.0 n.a. n.a. n.a. 0.3 4.3 n.a. 0.7 n.a. 0.7 n.a. 0.4 1.0 1.1 1.7 0.5 2.2 0.0 n.a. n.a. 0.0 n.a. 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 1 .I 0.4 n.a. 3.2
ma.= The data in the cell are suppressed to avoid disclosure of data of individual firms. Note: See Table 1 for notes and sources.
Table 4. Trade between parents and affiliates by country of parent and country of affiliate
Data are in US$ billion and refer to 1989
Sales ratio Sales from parents Sales from affiliates
(A)I(B) to affiliates to parents
U.S. firms in Japan Japanese firms in the United States
US. firms in Europe European firms in the United States
2.0 3.1 17.9 3.8
U.S. firms in Canada 32.1 32.5 1 .o Canadian firms in the United States 7.2 1.4 5.1
US. firms in other countries 20.4 24.9 0.8 Other nations firms in the United States 12.8 3.5 3.6
Source: See Table 1.
import propensity is to be expected in the early stages of foreign direct invest- ment (Broadman, 1991). As of fiscal year 1991, the average ratio of foreign sales relative to domestic sales for Japanese manufacturing industry was estimated at about 7 per cent, which was far lower than the corresponding US. figure for 1989 (24 per cent).I4
As for manufacturing, Japanese intra-firm trade is largely concentrated in certain industries, notably transportation equipment and electrical machinery. This type of intra-firm trade involves exports of parts and components from Japanese parent firms to their foreign affiliates for assembly production within a vertically integrated interna- tional production structure. On the import side, Japanese manufacturing intra-firm trade is concentrated on petroleum and coal products. The fact that intra-firm imports into Japan of transportation equipment and electrical machinery are of minor significance suggests that final products assembled by foreign affiliates in these industries are either sold in local markets or shipped to unrelated buyers in third-country markets.
It can also be seen from Table 5 that Japans intra-firm import ratios tend to be lower than its export ratios, especially for manufacturing. The only manufacturing industries for which import ratios are larger than export ratios are resource or labour- intensive industries such as petroleum and coal products, textiles, and wood and paper products.
Table 5. Japanese intra-firm trade Fiscal year 1989
A ul P
(A) E X D O ~ ~ S ShiDDed bv Javanese Darents
Industry of parents to foreign a~liates ‘
(Percentage share) (Billion Yen)
All industries All manufacturing
of which: Food and beverages Textiles Wood and paper prod. Chemicals Iron and steel Non-ferrous metals Machinery
General machinery Electrical machinery Transport equipment
Precision instruments Petroleumkoal prod. Other manufactures
15 533 9 912
12 4 5
220 22 57
597 4 008 3 639
0.1 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.4
3.8 25.8 23.4 3.5 0.3 4.9
Wholesale and retail trade 5 596 36.0
Imports shipped to Japanese parents
(Percentage (Billion Yen) share)
(6) Intra-firm export
ratio (per cent)
11 128 100.0 %: 1 3 037 27.3 19.0 3.3 4.8
43.8 50.9 41.1 52.8 36.3 43.8
77 0.7 24 0.2 75 0.7 46 0.4
5 0.0 35 0.3
31 779 610 37
1 223 94
0.3 7.0 5.5 0.3
24.4 I 8 061 72.4
(D) Intra-firm import
ratio (per cent)
14.7 15.1 22.9
9.8 0.5 5.7
33.7 35.8 36.0 38.1 51.8 25.1
1. Intra-firm trade ratio (exports and imports) is defined as the value of trade between Japanese parents and their foreign affiliates as a percentage of total trade of Japanese
Source: MlTl (1991), Dai 4 Kai Kaigai Jigyo Katsudo Kihon Chosa (The Fourth Benchmark Survey of Foreign Business Activities, Fiscal Year 1989). parents.
IV. CONCLUDING REMARKS
There is evidence that intra-firm trade represents an important part of overall trade for both the United States and Japan in the case of machinery and transport equipment industries. On the other hand, the hypothesis that the trend towards globalisation in the 1980s, characterised by a foreign direct investment boom, would increase significantly the relative importance of intra-firm trade in a countrys foreign trade, does not seem to be borne out by the U S . experience.
The share of US. intra-firm trade in total trade was roughly stable at around 35 to 40 per cent in the latter half of the 1980s. One explanation for this stability would be that US. parent firms might have preferred to rely more intensively on contractual arrange- ments with unrelated parties with respect to the use of firm-specific assets. Casual observation suggests that there has been an increasing use of OEM (original equip- ment manufacturing) operations in the case of various consumer electronic products as well as of other contractual arrangements between unrelated parties, including franchising operations in the case of consumer goods and services with a strong brand identity. Another possible explanation would be that U S . MNEs started the globalisa- tion of their operations earlier – in the 1960s and 1970s – and that US. outward direct investment in the 1980s might have been somehow different in nature compared with the previous two decades. But this is just speculation and further data and analysis are needed to explain trends in intra-firm trade.
The example of Japanese companies in the United States and elsewhere attests to the importance of investment in wholesale or distributional activities in the promotion of exports. This result seems to validate the recent attention paid to the removal of structural barriers to trade and investment, including the US.-Japan Structural Impedi- ments Initiative. There may also be a link between increasing investment in wholesale activities and the growing tendency of customising final products, as the former allows the gathering of information on final consumers tastes and needs.
Intra-firm trade raises a number of implications for trade policy. Important ques- tions remain unanswered, however, given the limitations of the data. For instance, it is not yet possible to tell whether or how the effectiveness of certain trade policy tools -such as tariffs, safeguards, anti-dumping and countervailing duties – are increased or hampered by the existence of intra-firm trade.
1. The annual average of US. direct investment flows abroad increased from US$9.6 billion in 1980-84 to US$22.8 billion in 1985-89. Similarly, the annual average of direct investment in the United States jumped from US$18.6 billion to US$48.2 billion during the same period ( B E 1992, p. 93). See also Julius (1990).
2. See UNIDO (1981) for a concise survey of earlier studies on intra-firm trade. 3. In the case of other OECD countries, there are virtually no data available with respect to
intra-firm trade. 4. There is an aggregation problem with respect to the calculation of intra-industry trade
indices. The interpretation of such indices depends on the definition of product categories, as the Choice of the classification system (product based or process based) and the level of aggregation of the data may strongly influence the results.
5. However, intra-industry trade is of less importance for Australia, Japan and New Zealand, where its share of total trade in manufactures ranges between 30 and 40 per cent (Fukasaku, 1992).
6. In addition, MlTl conducts annual surveys of majority-owned Japanese firms with foreign parents. However, the relative importance of such firms in Japans foreign trade is still very small and therefore such firms were excluded from the present study. In fiscal year 1989, intra-firm trade of majority-owned Japanese firms with foreign parents accounted for roughly 4 per cent of total Japanese merchandise trade (exports and imports).
7. A survey of intra-firm trade across the Canada-U.S. border has been conducted by the International Business Centre of the Canadian Conference Board. The results of this survey are examined in a paper by Krajewski (1992). It covers bilateral US.-Canada intra-firm trade for the period between 1985 and 1990.
8. The response ratio for the benchmark survey in fiscal year 1989 was 47 per cent, compared with 33 per cent in 1986. For 1989, MlTl estimated that the firms responding to the survey accounted for 24 per cent of total domestic sales.
9. See for example, Hipple (1990) regarding the U.S. data on intra-firm trade 10. In Japan and the United States, a company is defined as an affiliate if the parent company
owns 10 per cent or more of its voting stock. If the parent company owns more than 50 per cent of the voting stock, the affiliate company is considered a subsidiary of the parent company and is called a majority-owned foreign affiliate (MOFA).
11. There may exist some duplication between the two data sets on US. intra-firm trade (one on trade between U.S. parents and their foreign affiliates and the other on trade between U.S. affiliates and their foreign parents). This duplication is probably very small, however, as it would only exist when trade occurred between U.S. and foreign companies that had mutual ownership of 10 per cent or more in each other.
12. The share of intra-firm exports between the U S . parents and their foreign affiliates relative to total U.S. merchandise trade seems to have decreased between 1977 and 1982, followed by a temporary recovery in 1982-85 and subsequent decline afterwards. This U-shaped phe-
nomenon observed in the 1980s might have been related to exchange-rate fluctuations over the period; intra-firm trade may be less responsive to exchange-rate movements than arm’s length trade. For a discussion of the relative responsiveness of intra-firm trade to exchange- rate fluctuations, see Goldsbrough (1981), Julius (1990), Broadman (1991) and Encarnation (1992).
13. The exclusion of oil and minerals from the data does not significantly alter the results described above. Excluding oil and minerals, US. firms’ purchases from their foreign affili- ates decreased from 14.9 per cent of total US. merchandise imports in 1977 to 13.4 per cent in 1982, but then recovered to 14.9 per cent in 1989.
14. See MlTl (1992, p. 17).
Bank for International Settlements, 62nd Annual Report, Basle, June 1992. Barker, B. L., US. merchandise trade associated with U S . multinational companies, Survey of
Current Business, pp. 55-72, May 1986. Benvignati, A. M., Industry determinants and differences in US. intrafirm and arms-length
exports, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 72, pp. 481 -488, August 1990. Broadman, H. G., The trade – foreign investment linkage: principles, facts and policies, The
Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, D.C., 1991.
Encarnation, D. J., Rivals Beyond Trade: America Versus Japan in Global Competition, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1992.
Fukasaku, K., Economic regionalisation and intra-industry trade: Pacific-Asian perspectives, Technical Paper No. 53, OECD Development Centre, Paris, 1992.
Goldsbrough, D. J., International trade of multinational corporations and its responsiveness as changes in aggregate demand and relative prices, IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 28, pp. 573-599, September 1981.
Greenaway, D. and Milner, C., The Economics of lntra-lndustry Trade, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1986.
Gross, M., lntra-firm trade with ASEAN countries by Japanese and U S . multinational corpora- tions, Working Paper No. 273, Kiel Institute for World Economics, 1986.
Grubel, H. G. and Lloyd, P.-J., lntra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of lnterna- tional Trade in Differentiated Products, MacMillan, London, 1975.
Grubert, H. and Mutti, J., Taxes, tariffs and transfer pricing in multinational corporate decision making, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 73, pp. 285-293, May 1991.
Hipple, F. S., Multinational companies and international trade: the impact of intra-firm shipments of U.S. foreign trade, 1977-1982, Journal of International Business Studies, No. 3,
Julius, D., Global Companies and Public Policy: The Growing Challenge of Foreign Direct Investment, Pinter Publishers, London, 1990.
Krajewski, S., Multinational Firms Across the Canada-U.S. Border: An lnvestigation of Intra-firm Trade and Other Activities, International Business Research Centre, Ontario, Canada, 1992.
MITI, Dai 27 Kai Wagakuni Kigyo no Kaigai Jigyo Katsudo (The 21st Survey of Japanese Firms Overseas Business Activities), Tokyo, 1992.
Oman, C., New Forms of Investment in Developing Country Industries: Mining, Petrochemicals, Automobiles, Textiles and Food, OECD Development Centre, Paris, 1989.
Siddharthan, N. S. and Kumar, M., The determinants of inter-industry variations in the propor- tion of intra-firm trade: the behaviour of U S . multinationals, Weltwirtschaffliches Archiv,
pp. 495-504, 1990.
Vol. 126, pp. 581-590, 1990.
UNIDO, lntra-firm trade and international industrial restructuring, UNIDO Working Papers on Structural Changes, No. 20, October 1981.
Yamawaki, H., Exports and foreign distributional activities: evidence on Japanese firms in the United States, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 73, pp. 294-300, May 1991.
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
- Plagiarism free papers
- Timely delivery
- Any deadline
- Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
- Subject-relevant academic writer
- Adherence to paper instructions
- Ability to tackle bulk assignments
- Reasonable prices
- 24/7 Customer Support
- Get superb grades consistently
Online Academic Help With Different Subjects
Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.
Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.
While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.
Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.
In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.
Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.
We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!
We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.
Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.
What discipline/subjects do you deal in?
We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.
Are your writers competent enough to handle my paper?
Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.
What if I don’t like the paper?
There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.
- When assigning your order, we match the paper’s discipline with the writer’s field/specialization. Since all our writers are graduates, we match the paper’s subject with the field the writer studied. For instance, if it’s a nursing paper, only a nursing graduate and writer will handle it. Furthermore, all our writers have academic writing experience and top-notch research skills.
- We have a quality assurance that reviews the paper before it gets to you. As such, we ensure that you get a paper that meets the required standard and will most definitely make the grade.
In the event that you don’t like your paper:
- The writer will revise the paper up to your pleasing. You have unlimited revisions. You simply need to highlight what specifically you don’t like about the paper, and the writer will make the amendments. The paper will be revised until you are satisfied. Revisions are free of charge
- We will have a different writer write the paper from scratch.
- Last resort, if the above does not work, we will refund your money.
Will the professor find out I didn’t write the paper myself?
Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.
What if the paper is plagiarized?
We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.
When will I get my paper?
You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.
Will anyone find out that I used your services?
We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.
How our Assignment Help Service Works
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
2. Pay for the order
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
3. Track the progress
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
4. Download the paper
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.