Opposing Viewpoints Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer: This is a machine generated PDF of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your
convenience and is in no way intended to replace original scanned PDF. Neither Cengage Learning nor its licensors make any
representations or warranties with respect to the machine generated PDF. The PDF is automatically generated “AS IS” and “AS
PURPOSE. Your use of the machine generated PDF is subject to all use restrictions contained in The Cengage Learning
Subscription and License Agreement and/or the Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints Terms and Conditions and by using the
machine generated PDF functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against Cengage Learning or its licensors for your use of
the machine generated PDF functionality and any output derived therefrom.
U.S. under George W. Bush: from republic to empire: Lyndon
Johnson and Richard Nixon were labelled imperial
presidents,” recalls former White House adviser Roger Morris
Author: Roger Morris
Date: Apr. 14, 2003
From: Globe & Mail (Toronto, Canada)
Publisher: CNW Group Ltd. – Globe & Mail
Document Type: Article
Length: 1,896 words
Content Level: (Level 4)
Full Text:
Whatever his triumph in Iraq, George W. Bush already enjoyed a victory of historic proportions in the United States. By unique
dominance of Congress and the rest of government, and to the approval of the American media and an impressive majority in the
polls, Mr. Bush had acquired power beyond the grasp of any predecessor. Before U.S. forces ever roared through Baghdad, their
Commander-in-Chief was America’s most imperial president.
The spectre of an emperor in the White House is familiar to an American system that lurches between the wider powers of the
modern president and the long-sacred constitutional restraints placed on executive supremacy. In his noted 1973 book, The Imperial
Presidency, historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. warned of “presidential power so spacious and peremptory as to imply a radical
transformation of the traditional polity.” Cases in point were Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon, whose conduct from the Vietnam
War to the Watergate scandal seemed to many to be a dangerous culmination of might and pretension assembled in the Oval Office.
By the mid 1970s, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Nixon had left Washington in disrepute. Congress reasserted itself in the War Powers Act,
which limited the unilateral power of the president to go to war, and take certain other steps. Presidential authority shrank under
Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter.
As Capitol Hill and the White House divided between Republicans and Democrats, the traditional shifting balance between legislative
and executive branches continued throughout the 1980s and 1990s under the administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush
and Bill Clinton. An imperial presidency seemed the relic of a bygone era.
Now George W. Bush has sharply reversed that history. His empire began with the surrender of Congress, a collapse almost as
sweeping as the fall of the Baghdad regime.
In the 1960s, Lyndon Johnson had his Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, the 1964 act that endorsed U.S. entry into the Vietnam War.
President Johnson liked to refer to it as “grandma’s nightshirt” because the legislation covered everything. To strike Iraq, Mr. Bush
demanded and got from legislators an even broader cloak for invasion, occupation, and further military action in the Middle East and
Like the Tonkin measure, hastily voted amid what proved to be false reports of a North Vietnamese attack on U.S. vessels, this
Congress’s Iraqi resolution passed with scant debate and a brandishing of bogus intelligence, such as the forgery of Iraqi nuclear
procurement from Niger. In a stroke, the blank cheque for Mr. Bush swept away the legal requirement of a congressional declaration
of war or even compliance with the 1973 War Powers Act.
As a result, the White House was ceded sovereign authority to justify and launch full-scale hostilities — a right vested by the
Constitution in the Congress precisely to prevent such fateful power falling to any one president and handful of advisers.
The groundwork for this usurpation was laid last September with the National Security Strategy Mr. Bush sent to Congress. In this
document, the President claimed the right — indeed, responsibility — to take pre-emptive action against perceived future threats to the
security of the United States. From this, it was but a short jump to his Iraqi venture. Claiming a prerogative to invade Iraq as a “clear
and present danger” to peace — it was by no means “clear” to much of the world or even Iraq’s closest neighbours, and it was by no
means “present” even in his prediction of a threat “in one year or five years” — Mr. Bush erased long-recognized limits on the right of
any nation to attack another.
If the unilateral abrogation alarmed allies, friends and the United Nations, however, it went unchallenged on Capitol Hill, another sign
that any internal democratic restraint on the President’s war-making was a dead letter.
Added to all this was an equally historic concentration of power in domestic affairs. By the Patriot Act and other enabling laws in the
pervasive new realm of “Homeland Security,” Mr. Bush has brought an imperial presidency home to a depth and breadth that Lyndon
Johnson, with his furtive FBI spying on antiwar groups, or even Richard Nixon, with his Watergate “plumbers” and other
extraconstitutional means, never contemplated. Under Attorney-General John Ashcroft, the Justice Department now has the kind of
licence to conduct the political surveillance without probable cause or court sanction that many of the Nixon men went to prison for.
As no other federal government before it, the Bush administration wields the authority to arrest and hold suspects without charge,
detain prisoners indefinitely, and deny access to legal counsel, all with unparalleled secrecy.
It would be easy to attribute this singular massing of power to predictable chauvinist politics in America’s reaction to the shock of
Sept. 11. There is comfort in thinking of Mr. Bush as one more president riding the crest of a breaking wave — and that the tide will
turn back, as always, to constitutional balance. Yet, even apart from the uncertain course of the “war on terrorism,” or Washington’s
open-ended evocation of it, that optimistic view ignores decisive new realities in U.S. politics — and the emerging reality of George W.
Bush himself.
Today’s imperial presidency looms over political parties and a Congress very different from those of the recent past. President
Johnson faced formidable critics from his own party, such as senators William Fulbright, Robert Kennedy and Eugene McCarthy. Mr.
Nixon fought to the end a Democratic-ruled Senate and House, and the resistance of many influential Republican moderates.
President Bush, on the other hand, will deliver his Iraqi war victory speech to houses of Congress dominated by conservative
Republicans, with GOP moderates a rarity and rebels extinct. Their religious fundamentalist leaders, as well as the rank and file, not
only back the President’s new reach with domestic repression and foreign retribution, but also share the larger geo-strategic urge to
American hegemony behind the war on Iraq.
In their all but silent minority, today’s congressional Democrats are similarly to the political right of their predecessors, and bow no
less to enlarged presidential power at home and abroad — if not to Mr. Bush benefiting from it. The “bipartisan” approach by this
Congress that goes beyond terrorism and Iraq is an abdication of legislative responsibility. Congress has ceded the White House
exceptional authority over trade agreements, allowed it to rewrite the usually sacrosanct farm bill, capitulated on the $400-billion
military budget. The sort of party revolt that forced Mr. Johnson to retire, or the bipartisan ballast to Mr. Nixon’s command, are
nowhere in the offing for Mr. Bush.
Not least in a new calculus of an imperial presidency is the man in the Oval Office. George W. Bush, of course, was an unlikely
emperor — America’s least informed modern president in world affairs. For the first nine months of his term — it now seems hard to
remember — he was a lacklustre, evidently purposeless and unprepossessing politician of ridiculed syntax and shrouded electoral
legitimacy. Questions about his suspect business dealings, or the sway over his administration of corporate interests, even more
egregious than Washington’s accepted captivity to moneyed power, began to swirl about the White House. Then, in perhaps the most
dramatic effect of its kind in American history, Sept. 11 transformed the man as well as the political setting.
“Every president reconstructs the presidency,” Mr. Schlesinger wrote of the imperial impulse, “to meet his own psychological needs.”
Elevated by terrorist attacks from a butt of satire to a commanding leader disposing an awesome, vengeful power, Mr. Bush took on
his own reconstruction with earnest determination, even gusto, finding his yet undefined political destiny in an expansively defined
war on terrorism.
As the first inside testimony of his presidency tells, he remains much the man he was before his new power and purpose, still lacking
knowledge and experience, while still caustic about opponents, still convinced of his own sound judgment and moral rectitude. By all
accounts, he has adopted naturally the concept of a “spacious” and “peremptory” authority that Mr. Schlesinger saw in the elected
emperor. In contrast to Lyndon Johnson’s Washington-backroom politicking or Richard Nixon’s aloof cynicism, it is Mr. Bush’s mixture
of his old defiant self-assurance and his new sense of mission that makes his exercise of the imperial presidency all the more
That grip only tightens with the President’s domination of the government beneath him, as well as the acquiescence, if not outright
support, he enjoys from the American media, and the personal popularity he wins. The role of a small clique of officials in the decision
to invade Iraq — Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, his deputy Paul Wolfowitz, Pentagon consultant Richard Perle and others who
have long advocated an attack — is well known from coverage of the war. Less noted, however, is how much their bureaucratic
dominance of the military, State Department and intelligence agencies in the process added to the power of a president who
embraced their strategy so completely. Mr. Bush and his hawkish advisers face another battle altogether in their ambitious vision of
Iraqi democracy and its inspiration for freer regimes across the Middle East. But their swift military victory disarmed, along with
Saddam Hussein, any U.S. bureaucratic opposition to the President’s writ, fixing a White House mastery over foreign affairs not seen
in Washington since the policy autocracy of Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger.
So, too, Mr. Bush stands likely to have a prolonged honeymoon with the American media. It is not only that television coverage in
particular — epitomized by the ironically named “embedded reporters” — has cheerled the advance into Baghdad. Crippled by selfcensorship, often by its lack of knowledge or sensibility, and without a vocal opposition in Congress to report by default, American
journalism will give the new imperial president publicity his forerunners could only envy.
Finally, there is Mr. Bush’s paradoxical popularity. If 70 per cent to 75 per cent of Americans approve of his war and performance, the
same number question a sagging economy and other issues that are his least-imperial domains. Yet the White House has a manifest
capacity to keep the terrorist threat a political preoccupation. Its public shows an equally clear acceptance of a strong leader to deal
with the post-Sept. 11 world. The combination will certainly rescue Mr. Bush from the return to domestic concerns and resulting fall in
popularity that his father suffered after the first war in the Persian Gulf — yet another reason why this imperial presidency will not soon
All this makes for a certain irony when Mr. Bush comes before the Congress to announce the triumph in Iraq, basking in his new
power won at the constitutional expense of the very chambers that will hail him.
Not that this should surprise us. Shortly before he died in 1989, the eminent American writer Robert Penn Warren, author of All The
King’s Men, a novel about a democratic demagogue and dictator, was asked if he foresaw another president with too much power.
“Well, it’ll probably be someone you least expect under circumstances nobody foresaw,” he said. “And, of course, it’ll come with a
standing ovation from Congress.”
Roger Morris, a member of the National Security Council under presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon, is the author of
Richard Milhous Nixon: The Rise of an American Politician and Partners in Power: The Clintons and Their America.
Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2003 CNW Group Ltd. – Globe & Mail. Globe & Mail
Source Citation (MLA 8th Edition)
Roger Morris. “U.S. under George W. Bush: from republic to empire: Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon were labelled imperial
presidents,’ recalls former White House adviser Roger Morris.” Globe & Mail [Toronto, Canada], 14 Apr. 2003. Gale In Context:
Opposing Viewpoints, https://link-galecom.proxy16.noblenet.org/apps/doc/A30594968/OVIC?u=mlin_b_bunkhcc&sid=OVIC&xid=b74d114b. Accessed 1 July 2020.
Gale Document Number: GALE|A30594968

Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply

Buy Custom Essay

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Opposing Viewpoints Terms and Conditions
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?

Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.

Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?

  • Plagiarism free papers
  • Timely delivery
  • Any deadline
  • Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
  • Subject-relevant academic writer
  • Adherence to paper instructions
  • Ability to tackle bulk assignments
  • Reasonable prices
  • 24/7 Customer Support
  • Get superb grades consistently

Online Academic Help With Different Subjects


Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.


Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.

Computer science

Computer science is a tough subject. Fortunately, our computer science experts are up to the match. No need to stress and have sleepless nights. Our academic writers will tackle all your computer science assignments and deliver them on time. Let us handle all your python, java, ruby, JavaScript, php , C+ assignments!


While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.


Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.


In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.


Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.


We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!


We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.


Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.

What discipline/subjects do you deal in?

We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.

Are your writers competent enough to handle my paper?

Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.

What if I don’t like the paper?

There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.

Reasons being:

  • When assigning your order, we match the paper’s discipline with the writer’s field/specialization. Since all our writers are graduates, we match the paper’s subject with the field the writer studied. For instance, if it’s a nursing paper, only a nursing graduate and writer will handle it. Furthermore, all our writers have academic writing experience and top-notch research skills.
  • We have a quality assurance that reviews the paper before it gets to you. As such, we ensure that you get a paper that meets the required standard and will most definitely make the grade.

In the event that you don’t like your paper:

  • The writer will revise the paper up to your pleasing. You have unlimited revisions. You simply need to highlight what specifically you don’t like about the paper, and the writer will make the amendments. The paper will be revised until you are satisfied. Revisions are free of charge
  • We will have a different writer write the paper from scratch.
  • Last resort, if the above does not work, we will refund your money.

Will the professor find out I didn’t write the paper myself?

Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.

What if the paper is plagiarized?

We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.

When will I get my paper?

You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.

Will anyone find out that I used your services?

We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.

How our Assignment Help Service Works

1. Place an order

You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.

2. Pay for the order

Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.

3. Track the progress

You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.

4. Download the paper

The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.

smile and order essay GET A PERFECT SCORE!!! smile and order essay Buy Custom Essay