Wireless Networks Performance Evaluation

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines

Trimester T1 2019

Unit Code MN603

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Wireless Networks Performance Evaluation
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Unit Title Wireless Networks and Security

Assessment Type

Individual Assignment 1

Assessment Title

Wireless networks performance evaluation

Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping)

The purpose of the assignment is to compare the wireless communication technologies and evaluate their performance. Students will be able to complete the following ULOs:

b. Compare standards-based technologies used in various networks; c. Test and evaluate various wireless networks performance;

Weight 10%

Total Marks 60

Word limit 1500 – 2000 words

Due Date 03/05/2019 5:00PM

Submission Guidelines

 All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.

 The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.

 Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.

Extension  If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment

Academic Misconduct

 Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/Plagiarism-Academic-Misconduct-Policy- Procedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.

MN603 Wireless Networks and Security Page#2 of 4

Prepared by: Dr Javed Ali Baloch Moderated by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha April, 2019

Assignment Description

Wireless networks performance varies from wired networks, the latter uses a guided medium and wireless networks use unguided medium for transmission. To design and simulate wireless networks the network simulator – 2 (NS – 2), an open source discreet event simulator could be used. The NS-2 simulator is a widely used simulation tool, which could generate trace files for analysis and comes with a network animator to visualize the network performance. This assessment requires students to compare and evaluate the performance of wireless routing protocols using the NS-2. The assessment requires students to design a wireless network topology in NS-2 and evaluate the generated trace files for two different wireless routing protocols. The students are required to carry out a critical analysis of the results of the two routing protocols, by plotting graphs and discussing the outcomes. The students are required to:

 Design a wireless network consisting of 20 nodes; the dimensions for the given topology are 400×300. The agent type should be UDP and the traffic CBR. The simulation should run for 300 seconds. Uniform deployment of nodes is required and the nodes are required to transmit packets over the network. The wireless node configuration should include the NS-2 energy model.

 Run the simulation on two different routing protocols such as DSDV, AODV, DSR, and TORA. Critically analyse the trace files in terms of packets sent, received, dropped and energy consumed. These parameters should be plotted on graphs and discussed in detail

 Include screenshots of the NAM displaying the nodes uniformly deployed during the simulation and add at least 3 screen shots of the simulation.

 Appendix I should include the tcl srcript used in each simulation.

MN603 Wireless Networks and Security Page#3 of 4

Prepared by: Dr Javed Ali Baloch Moderated by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha April, 2019

Marking criteria:

Section to be included in the report

Description of the section Marks

Introduction Outline of the report ( in 3-4 sentences) 4

Report Layout Report layout, style and language 5

Network Design The network topology shown in the NAM 5

Simulation Three simulation screen shots for each routing protocol at 50s, 150s and 250s simulation time with description of the ongoing events.

12

Trace file analysis Provide a critical analysis of the two trace files in terms of packets sent, received, dropped and energy consumption.

8

Results Plot the graphs for packets sent, received, dropped and energy consumption for the two protocols.

8

Conclusion Write summary of the report 4

Reference style Follow IEEE reference style 4

Appendix 1 The tcl files for each routing protocol 10

Total 60

Marking Rubric for Assignment #1: Total Marks 60

Grade Mark

HD 80% -100%

DI 70% – 79%

CR 60 – 69%

P 50% – 59%

Fail <50%

Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

Introduction

/4

All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated

Topics are relevant and soundly analysed.

Generally relevant and analysed.

Some relevance and briefly presented.

This is not relevant to the assignment topic.

Report Layout

/5

Exceptional report layout, style and language used

Very good report layout, style and language used

Good report layout, style and language used

Acceptable report layout, style and language used.

Poor report layout, style and language used.

Network Design

/5

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and present an exceptional design considering all the requirements

Demonstrated ed good ability to think critically and present an exceptional design considering all the requirement s

Demonstrate d good ability to think critically and present a good design considering all the requirements.

Demonstrated ability to think critically and present a design

Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and present a design.

MN603 Wireless Networks and Security Page#4 of 4

Prepared by: Dr Javed Ali Baloch Moderated by: Dr Sanjeeb Shrestha April, 2019

Simulation

/12

Excellent screen shot of the uniformly deployed nodes

Very good screen shot of the uniformly deployed nodes

Good screen shot of the uniformly deployed nodes

Screen shot of the uniformly deployed nodes.

Failed to provide a screenshot of the uniformly deployed nodes

Trace file analysis

/8

Excellent analysis of the trace files. covered all aspects.

Very Good analysis of the trace files

Good analysis of trace files

Some analysis provided of trace files

Lacking analysis of trace files

Results

/8

Excellent graphs well labelled and clear

Very Good graphs well labelled and clear

Good graphs well labelled and clear

Graphs not well labelled and clear

Failed to provide graphs

Conclusion

/4

Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments

Consistency logical and convincing

Mostly consistent logical and convincing

Adequate cohesion and conviction

Argument is confused and disjointed

Reference style

/4

Clear styles with excellent source of references.

Clear referencing style

Generally good referencing style

Sometimes clear referencing style

Lacks consistency with many errors

Appendix 1

/10

The tcl files were well commented

The tcl files were complete and missing a few comments

The tcl files were complete with some comments

The tcl files were missing comments

The tcl files were missing

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *